| Bottom of the morning. |
![]() Blog For Free! Archives Home 2009 April 2008 December 2008 October 2008 June 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2007 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 July 2007 April 2007 February 2006 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 April 2006 February 2006 January 2005 November 2005 October tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog |
posted by: Cutter (reply) post date: 10.01.06 (11:28 am) I voted against Bush. (Lotta good it did.) I've yet to register to vote here. I've been here (in Massachusetts) since December of 2004, but after the results of the 2004 election... added to the absolute fear of being called for jury duty, it's not been high on my list of priorities. They should stop making jury duty mandatory. I could write pages, if I felt able, about why I feel that it is both classist and wrong to have it be linked to voting, but... my brain just can't get there today. I have the registration forms on my table here, and I've been debating whether or not to register. I think it says something that an (obviously) opinionated guy like myself even debates it. usa usa usa? posted by: mimi (reply) post date: 10.01.06 (4:14 pm) i don't know all that much, but i think you might be on to something, using "famous" people as a draw to bring us out to vote. folks line up in the middle of the night to buy tickets to see these people, why not line up to see them live...BUT i really believe, and have believed well before i was "old enough" to vote, that because of the "electoral college", the people's vote doesn't count for squat, anyway. xoxoxo ps..plz don't disappear again : ) xoxox posted by: lindy (reply) post date: 10.02.06 (4:56 am) Reply to: cutter I voted against Bush too - anyone to keep him out of office. I don't know why we bother either, considering an honest vote count would have seen him on the losing end. I agree with you on the jury duty, but surely you'd be medically excused, right? I wonder if they'd allow the excuse that my belief system doesn't allow support for a corrupt system.. hmm.. somehow I suspect that wouldn't fly. Of course, if jury duty became optional, they wouldn't have anymore juries. Unless they actually started paying decent money for the job, but then, that would bring out some pretty dismal characters for the job.. *snort* as if they are somehow worse than the corrupt pigs who are running the joint. -sigh- It seems hopeless, doesn't it. posted by: lindy (reply) post date: 10.02.06 (5:00 am) Reply to: mimi I need to read up on the electoral college. It's fishy. That much is clear. I bet you know more than most Americans.. you probably know more than I do. (I'd love for that to be a compliment, but, haha, I don't know much either). You and I fall into the 'common people' who would get torn to shreds if we tried to enter into a 'serious' discussion with people who pride themselves on their political prowess. phhhhhhh. posted by: radiohead (reply) post date: 10.03.06 (7:28 am) In California, they use the DMV records for jury duty, not voting registrations...I get notices all the time for the job, but since I can't participate I have to tell the government they picked a wrong candidate...I wonder how many people actually show up that aren't citizens...kinda sad to see our tax money going to a system that obviously doesn't work... ah well... good post, I agree with it...! posted by: lindy (reply) post date: 10.03.06 (8:26 am) Reply to: radiohead Thanks, RH. I like the idea of linking jury duty with a driver's license. I'd rather discourage driving than voting, heh. :) posted by: Cutter (reply) post date: 10.04.06 (8:33 am) AMEN! posted by: Cutter (reply) post date: 10.04.06 (8:36 am) Though, on second thought, the DMV isn't just about driving, it's about giving out legal picture IDs, which we all have to have. Even I have a "non-drivers license", which I had to get through the DMV. Dernit. I squashed my own hopes! This brain is a pain in the patoo sometimes. posted by: basild (reply) post date: 10.05.06 (10:00 am) Re: your motivation for blogging. I experienced the exact same thing, which is why I left tblog last year. I shot into the hot-blog list, had tons of feedback, and promptly lost my desire for blogging because I felt like I *had* to write to keep up my readership. I'm happier now with my few (very few) visitors posted by: Lindy (reply) post date: 10.05.06 (11:27 am) Reply to: basild I wondered if that was the case. It's difficult when there is obligation to readers. I don't know how professional authors do it. I mean, you really have to step outside yourself just to maintain. This is precisely why I don't post often. I try to keep it to once a month here so that only a few people check back and leave a thought of two. Otherwise, it gets crazy. I remember too well that this is the way your blog was, in fact, that was often why I didn't comment. I figured you already had your hands full. Nice to see some balance for both of us. I hope it continues. posted by: Boomster (reply) post date: 10.12.06 (5:48 am) Blog on I say...Blog on!! posted by: lindy (reply) post date: 10.12.06 (8:46 am) Reply to: Boomster Haha, will do, Boomster. (eventually) :) posted by: cmaze (reply) post date: 10.16.06 (9:57 pm) good things, lots of good things. just popped in to say hello. |
|