Awake and irritated.


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 June
2008 April
2008 March
2008 February
2007 December
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 July
2007 April
2007 February
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 April
2006 February
2006 January
2005 November
2005 October

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



Awake and irritated.
09.14.06 (4:46 am)   [edit]

It's nearly four in the morning on what once was Wednesday night. I can't sleep due to the thoughts that refuse to settle down for the rest of the night. And since I'm away from my usual set up and can't be bothered with launching Dreamweaver on my own site.. here I am, posting on tblog in the middle of the quiet, still night. It's been a while since I've been in this situation. I'm looking around and realizing I don't miss it much. Life was so different when I needed this kind of outlet and wasn't able to sleep. (needed being the operative word here)

So what brings me around at this time? It would be easy to say September 11th, but that's the lazy person's excuse. I've got a meeting at my daughter's school first thing Friday morning and September 11th will be indirectly mentioned, though it's not the focus of my thoughts.

Media saturation. Promoting propaganda in a public middle school. Showing snuff footage to eleven and twelve year olds. Those are my topics. And I'll be addressing them directly to the principal of the school, unbeknownst to him or his staff and quite caught off guard, I imagine. Given that, I am likely to meet with much resistence, to encounter individuals questioning my sanity and ideals and in all likelihood, this principal will try to regain control of the meeting by dismissing the topic for a more appropriate time. I can't imagine a more appropriate time than right now.. at four in the morning, as I'm sitting here unable to sleep. But a meeting designed to discuss my daughter's educational plan will do almost as well.

The principal, counsellor, resource teacher and other administrators will likely categorize me as an over protective mother, or perhaps a control freak. I'm the first one to say I wear both. Of course, the intent involved in these labels is caring and guidance, something sorely lacking in many of the children I see every morning in this middle school. But I doubt such sentiments will be in the minds of the individuals feeling attacked come Friday morning.

I've already written in my more private journal about my experience this past Monday, when my daughter and I approached the middle school a few seconds after the bell rang. The American national anthem came on, so we stood still out of respect for American custom, as opposed to patriotism. We then entered the school and were asked over the speaker system to observe a minute of silence, which I believe happens every morning, but on this particular morning, it was given a specific purpose: to honor the victims of the World Trade Center from September 11th of 2001.

It was in that moment that my struggle began. I was angry. I wanted to walk defiantly into the office and go about my business. I wanted to show my daughter how a free-thinking individual handles bold-faced attempts to corral through fear at the hands of a rogue administration. I also wanted to keep my daughter respecting authority until she was older and in a better place to pick and choose when she conforms and when she speaks out. I wanted to set the example and.. I wanted to.. set the example. I stood there, finding my freedom in the moment, defiantly thinking of ways to positively impact that day, a day of living. A day that had nothing to do with terrorist attacks or crushing buildings, save the multitude of promotional media blurbs, keeping the fires burning, keeping the soul reeling, keeping the fear alive.

Fast forward to Monday evening. I came home to a short story about the September 11th, 2001 footage played in class, in every class in the school. My reaction was tempered, something along the lines of, 'How nice of them to provide that for us against our will. I guess the minute of silent observance wasn't quite enough.' I said it tongue-in-cheek of course. And we proceded to homework, dinner and bedtime.

When Devon and I found a few minutes on our own that evening, Devon.. detonated in quiet fashion, like only Devon can do. He expressed his outrage and went quite thoroughly down the list.. inappropriate material, lack of tv in our lives makes us more sensitive to the imagry, what business is it of the school to play this kind of footage, to introduce something so violent into their lives, their perspectives, what rating was the footage, why weren't the parents notified beforehand, etc. I was right there with him, but strangely, I was calmer. As Devon stated unequivocally his intentions to discuss this situation during the upcoming meeting, I expressed concern over whether it was the right time and place. I was thinking that the immediate goal of the meeting was to get help for my daughter in handling her classes and modifying the curriculum where appropriate. I knew that broaching our displeasure over the video would put a mood on the meeting and maybe even cast us in an unfavorable light, impacting how helpful the teachers chose to be in educating our daughter outside of the mainstream methods.

This is still on my mind. But while discussing this with Devon, it made sense that a meeting designed to discuss my daughter's education is certainly an appropriate place to bring up the propriety of the administration's decisions. Sending them a letter after the fact will only suffice in allowing the principal to craft a response designed to sweep the incident under the rug, so to speak - to make it go away - to offer damage control. A genuine answer and accountability will be more successful, sadly, with the element of surprise. I imagine some educational administrators might strongly disagree, but then, of course they would, as they have something to lose in the situation. We're talking about eleven and twelve year olds, not teenagers. I trust educators to sort out real education from propaganda, and they failed one hundred percent in this case. So, I'm going forward with this.

That I'm awake and thinking about this meeting two days before it is to take place speaks for my level of anxiety. I do not fear their opinion of me, but rather, the subtle ways that their irritation may manifest itself in their educating of my daughter. A school administrator would like to think that a child's education is at the top of their priority list, unfettered by prejudices, but alas, I have proof that it's not. Not in this case. Playing graphic footage from September 11th, 2001 doesn't fall within the realm of providing a safe, positive educational environment, no matter how you spin it. They have shown that they are incapable of sorting education from propaganda. And this from supposed academia.

Yep. I'm going to head in to that meeting with a powder keg. Well, two. Devon's coming. It may backfire, but I refuse to stay quiet. That's what George would want me to do, and after all, we have him to thank for the fear that grips this nation.

 


posted by: Cutter (reply)
post date: 09.14.06 (3:56 am)

I don't know how I'd handle it. Actually, I don't know if I could handle it at all. If it were me, I'd completely snap. Then, if it were me, I'd have snapped long before, thereby destroying my kid's sense of social well being.

If you can't change what the school does, hopefully you can counter-act it with "home based" education. Trust your kids to be intelligent enough to know what to do with propaganda, and how to integrate truth without bringing fear in for the ride... and help to teach them how to tell the difference between people who care, and people who want to manipulate and control.

...just an idea.

Sorry you couldn't sleep. :(



posted by: Lindy (reply)
post date: 09.14.06 (4:08 am)

I figured you'd relate to my ill timed wakefulness. Makes me appreciate the times I *do* get sleep. I hope you get some good naps in. Thanks for the suggestion. It's actually very helpful. I'm all caught up in what's out of my control and not focusing on what is within my influence. I needed to hear that, Cutter, so thank you.



posted by: mimi (reply)
post date: 09.14.06 (4:51 am)

you voiced your concerns beautifully and i know you will come up against exactly what you imagine...smug smiles and "tut, tut little lindy...you misunderstand our intentions," etc., but i agree with you to the nth degree...we all make choices and i also choose to limit my exposure to tv, especially the news because news is negative, thrill-seeking exploitation! negativity breeds negativity and fear is what they want us all to live under! you do what you can to make your mark and protect your rights and your child and her rights not to be exposed...overexposure to "snuff" tends to make our emotions numb after seeing so much of it and that is why our society thinks nothing of the value of life, especially of others and the world is colder and more callous. stand up and be heard, and know i am here backing you and devon in your right to speak out against this injustice! xoxoxo



posted by: Cutter (reply)
post date: 09.14.06 (5:04 am)

Shoot, the way I see it, If you attempt to protect your children from certain things, you suggest to your children that you feel they are not strong enough to handle it on their own. Once you do that, your children may well dedicate themselves to showing you just how strong they really are by seeking out that which you are attempting to shield them from, with or without your permission or guidance.



posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 09.14.06 (8:44 am)

Reply to: mimi

Thanks, Mimi. I appreciate your support. It's nice to hear that there are a few more people in the world aware of how negative the influence of television can be!




posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 09.14.06 (8:53 am)

Reply to: Cutter

You bring up a very good point, Cutter. You got Devon and I talking about it quite a bit. I try to avoid exposure to a lot of this stuff myself. It's a lifestyle choice that I take great pains to adhere to - no tv, as little mass media propaganda as possible, avoid movies with violence, etc. I may indeed be creating an area of taboo (time will tell, eh), but I also see it as an active choice in my lifestyle to simply abstain. I may find myself quite wrong in the matter, but I keep hoping that the lifestyle I create for my girls will become a comfort zone for them, even after they launch into the world as teenagers, young adults, ready to do all the things mom wouldn't let them. I may have it all wrong. But I keep thinking I'm doing something right because at present, my girls are two of the coolest people I know. They are children acting like children, instead of adults who've seen it all, done it all. Oh well. I'm sure they'll have a list of things they will do differently with their kids. -sigh-

Thanks for the input. I value it.




posted by: radiohead (reply)
post date: 09.14.06 (9:31 am)

I can see your point Lindy I honestly do. I guess I am more of the parent that says... "hey this is what people are doing, let's talk about it before your mind is corrupted by everyone else." My two sons, both six, and the fact that they are boys makes a huge difference, but anyway, I have talked to both of them about war, and the purpose of our soldiers being in Iraq. I've been told that they don't need to worry about that, or they are too young, but are they? People, media, school, children ...all have an opinion it seems. I guess for me, I'd rather my kids make their own opinions...I guess I say, if you are going to listen to someone else give you an opinion, at least know enough about both sides of the issue to make your own. I don't know if I am doing the right thing either, but I grew up not knowing anything and when kids would talk about it, I'd agree with them because I had nothing else to compare it to. Just thought I'd give my two sense...I am all about telling schools what is and isn't appropriate for your children...Good luck to you Friday!



posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 09.14.06 (12:34 pm)

Reply to: radiohead

Thank you, RH. It's true that we all have our own opinions and ways of raising kids. I'm just infuriated that the school felt the need to cross a line they really had no business doing. I really don't think they thought about what they were doing. I think they just followed along like sheep because it's what everyone else was doing. Should make for an interesting meeting. Thank you for your thoughts. :)




posted by: commontater (reply)
post date: 09.14.06 (12:44 pm)

Whoa, I can resonate with this discussion and I hope you don't mind if I say a ting or two. First, it gladdens my heart to know that there are parents of young children who know what's going on in our schools today and how it seems our .gov is the proverbial octopus with a hand in every facet of our lives. Personally, I see both sides to this and the need to inform children of the uglies and evils in the world, but notice I said "inform" then and not saturate them with horrific visual images that go on to affect their thinking, their perspective and mostly their spirit. As a parent, shielding their kids from visual and written propaganda is not the same as deliberately omitting the reality of such barbarism or the fact that absolute power corrupts absolutely. Words can paint a very vivid picture of reality without the visual sensationalism that TV dishes out daily.

I believe it's normal and expected that people recoil and shudder at seeing cut up bodies and atrocities, a sure sign of one's humanity and reverence for life. As you've said, constantly seeing images of maimed, mangled, and mutilated people deaden the senses and cheapens the sanctity of life, an old technology used by barbarians of the past in assuring population control. Do something repugnant in the village square to set an example to all what stepping out of line will result in. Luckily for Americans, we have a legacy of freedom, it flows through our bodies like blood and most of us could pass as William Wallace (Braveheart) if you push us too far for too long when it comes to our freedoms. I think this is a reason our .gov will have to bring out the big guns in order to reduce us all to quivering, fear-filled replicas of our former selves. It's also heartening that Lindy and Devon realize how much influence our schools have in shaping our kids thinking apparatus. I do believe it is in the school that we need to put our foot down, no make that, put the Monster-maul down on importants issues. At least those here know what kind of reception to expect while claiming your rights over your children, so you know what you're heading into as the minority. It's amazing we stop to think about, mull over and agonize about how we ought to say something to the offending entity, instead of saying what's on our minds without the PC factor. Afterall, we have one shot at life and at parenting and what better time than now to take a stand on principle. As they say, if you don't take a stand for something, you'll fall for anything. Plus, your soul is witness to the truth you have a chance to express in the here & now and won't forgive your betrayal of it.

But we do agonize over what and how we broach things to those who have power over our kids because we know there can be detrimental after effects for them. This ought to make us mad enough to take action as a group. It shouldn't be hard to find other parents who object to this kind of propagandizing from school officials. As a group go to the school board or at the next PTA meeting let them know exactly how you feel about their actions. If it's the only time you take an activist role, at least you'll know that you did *something* instead of nothing.

Good luck.



posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 09.14.06 (1:01 pm)

Reply to: commontater

You're going to ruin your reputation by making this much sense. I'm suddenly feeling galvanized. Ever read something and think, 'There is nothing else to say because this person said it perfectly.'? I really can't add to it. All I can do is sit here and nod my head in agreement. You can bet this will get read aloud this evening. In fact, I may include the girls in this round, as you hit it square on the head that we keep them informed without the unnecessary visuals. Well said, you. And thank you.




posted by: Cutter (reply)
post date: 09.17.06 (6:26 am)

Curious how everything went.



posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 09.18.06 (8:30 am)

Reply to: Cutter

Goodness, Cutter. Thanks for asking. You won't believe what I bit off in that meeting on Friday. Turns out, there's this news program that is aired *daily* in ALL the classrooms. It's called Channel One News. It's owned by the same corporation that bought out RJR Nabisco and they have absolutely nothing to do with news. Out of the 12 minutes they broadcast, two minutes are actual news related topics (unrated, uncensored) and of the rest of the 10 minutes of non-educational content, 2 full minutes are straight advertising that corporations pay $200,000 per 30 second increment to use. They hawk their goods (twinkies, soft drinks, candies, movies with sexual, violent and drug related content) to these 11, 12, 13 year olds (and high schoolers too) and it's literally a captive audience. The schools that sign contracts with Channel One are obligated to provide the audience. All of this in exchange for the *lending* of satelites, tvs and vcrs. The schools have sold 12 minutes a day of our kids to a corporation that pedals their crap to them. They cost tax payers $180 Billion a year in lost classroom time and there isn't a study out there are demonstrates that Channel One is educationally sound. But wait, it gets better.. schools across the nation that can *afford* to say no to Channel One, do! Only poor schools have Channel One in them because they just couldn't turn down those free tvs. Just about every national academic association has taken a stand against Channel One and ironically, the entire state of New York (Channel One's birth place) has banned it from all their classrooms.

The associate Principal who was in my meeting seemed rather ignorant about Channel One. Boy, have I got an eyeful of information for him. But I'm thinking that rather than try to convince the school to sever the contract, I'm just going to go straight to the school board and force them to prove that Channel One is beneficial to the kids.. which will be impossible, of course, because the real intent behind Channel One is to sell stuff to the kids. Crazy, huh?

I've already stated that my kiddo is to be removed from the class when Channel One is turned on. I figure a few letters to the PTA ought to turn a few heads. -sigh- Another fight. And all because I just want my kid to get an education free from the corruption of corporate expansion.

So, that's how it went. (!)




posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 09.18.06 (8:36 am)

Reply to: breakouttheglass

Hahaha, Nate, I love that. Guess what. I'm abot to raise a MASSIVE stink. Check out the comment I just left below yours to Cutter.. it pretty much lays it out.. I'm thinking about posting the letter I've drafted to the Principal, though I may just go completely around him and straight to the school board. I wish this was just about the occassional inappropriate airing of footage that happened because most of society are sheep and don't know any better, but it's more, so much more than that as I discovered in my meeting.. and even though your little girl is only three, depending on where you are, you may be glad to know about all this junk in advance so you can do something about it. Whew.. have I got a fight on my hands..



posted by: Cutter (reply)
post date: 09.18.06 (9:23 am)

Holy crap. That is downright digusting, Lindy. I'd be completely INFURIATED.



posted by: Cutter (reply)
post date: 09.18.06 (9:24 am)

...you know what, I AM completely infuriated. I can't believe that this is ok in anyone's opinion, in this country!!!


grrrrrrr!!!!!



posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 09.18.06 (10:10 am)

Reply to: Cutter

You and me both, Cutter. At least there are things we can do about it. While a lot of people just roll over and take it, I refuse to be one of them. I don't know how far I'll get, but you can bet I'm going to try. I just got a call from the school.. they let me know that they will allow my kid to leave the classroom for every Channel Once broadcast. They are sending her to the library where she can read. But that doesn't really help anyone else out. They don't know it yet, but I'm heading to the school board. I'll definitely let you know if I get anywhere. :)




posted by: Cutter (reply)
post date: 09.19.06 (5:58 am)

Had an epiphany!!!

Just sic Piddle on 'em!!!

;)

Much luck to you. I hope that something gives.

(Piddles bladder?)



posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 09.19.06 (9:46 am)

Reply to: Cutter

*giggle* Piddle would just lay back and say, 'Hey man, can't we all just get along?' He's the most Zen kitty I've ever seen. Now, Adderbury.. oh boy. ;)




posted by: FinalyFree (reply)
post date: 09.20.06 (11:42 am)

I guess I'm a little confused on this one, are you upset that the children are exposed to any television, or the propoganda-type 9/11 sequences? While I'll agree that 90% of what's broadcast on tv is garbage, I'll have to defend that other 10% of quality programming. I don't think I'd be bothered with a 'memorial' type broadcast, a remembrance type thing--no I don't want my kids or others being subjected to see 'what happens if we don't take care of the terrorists' BS. Granted my children are older, they vividly remember 9/11 and remember how we were all glued to our tv's for atleast 24 hours after the first plane hit.

Both of my kids have had Channel One in their classrooms before, neither of them were affected by it positively or negatively--my bet is they slept through it,lol. Now my daughter did have one teacher that would have them watch the news portion then turn off the set, the next day she'd have a quiz about the day's events. I don't think that's such a bad idea, especially since most of these kids never watched anything on tv dealing with national and world events.



posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 09.20.06 (6:44 pm)

Reply to: finalyfree

I'm against schools signing contracts that obligate my kids to watch 10 minutes of non-educational programming, including two minutes of straight advertising of various junk foods and inappropriate movies, etc. I also am against the idea that whatever 'news' Channel One sees fit to air doesn't pass through any kind of censor. It's unrated. It's obscene that it's happening in schools. I'm against children being exposed to snuff footage of the world trade center collapsing. While a teenager will most likely find ways (either inadvertently or by design) of viewing such, they are also better prepared to deal with it as they are more mature and have a bigger scope of the world. Eleven and twelve year olds should not be seeing this stuff at school. They should be learning from their parents. Schools have no business replacing parents roles. The schools are there to educate, to provide a positive, safe environment for children to learn in, to 'inform' not 'expose.' Teachers who turn off the tvs after the news segment, or don't air Channel One daily are, in fact, in breach of contract. While I'm happy about that when it's the case, the bottom line is that Channel One has no business being in schools because it is NOT an educational program. It is for advertising. It is for targeting a forced audience of teenagers who have no choice but to sit there and watch it. And while your kids may have slept through most of the junk the schools filtered through to them, it's difficult to tell whether this kind of programming had/has a negative or positive impact on them. Television stimulates your brain into producing alpha waves, which happen naturally only when sleeping - thus effectively putting the viewer in a comotose like state (unbeknownst to them) whilst they watch - the television injects fast paced images into a region of your brain that absorbs without discrimnation, bypassing completely, the two frontal cortex of your brain which consiously digest information. That means that your brain processes the information without the usual sensors that are engaged when, say, walking down the street. This is my main objection to television programming and I sure as heck don't want it in our schools. That our schools have sold our students to Channel One doesn't sit well with me. If you tried to find just one study out there that proved Channel One was beneficial to the education of our kids, you'd come up empty handed because such a report does not and can not exist. That's the long and short of it. I hope it makes more sense now.



posted by: surrogate (reply)
post date: 09.21.06 (5:13 am)

Hope the meeting went well. Sorry it's taken me so long to comment... Been sneaking on amid connection problems and haven't had relaxed internet time to read and comment.

I'm with you one the Channel one stuff. Annoys the hell out of me. This sort of thing was just getting off the ground when my kids exited public schools eight or so years ago, and I'm thankful they (and we) didn't have to deal with it. I remember attending a school board meeting when my youngest was a senior in high school and the debate over whether to allow Pepsi (and their products) to (a.) provide the classrooms with new T.V.'s (b.) be sold in the cafeteria and in vending machines throughout the facility and (c.) have commercials embedded within provided educational programming. I just shook my head and ignored the debate as I worried about my blood pressure going through the roof.

Now there's a Taco Bell IN the cafeteria of that school and last time I was there for a play, Posters adorned the walls with cryptic little educational messages and slick photos - and the Pepsi logo was proudly displayed in the bottom third of images.

"Pepsi is proud to bring you American History one!!!! Ya know, Pepsi wasn't around during the Revolutionary War, but had it been, you can bet it would have been the official cola of the Minutemen. Cool, refreshing, satisfying. Start you own Revolution. Pepsi. Drink it. Word."



posted by: FinalyFree (reply)
post date: 09.21.06 (5:50 am)

Reply to: lindy
Unfortunately so much of our 'society' revolves around money and endorsements. I don't like it either, but it seems to be a fact of life. It is nice to know that there are still some parents (like you) who take the time to investigate what's going on at their children's schools and voice your concern. I live in a family of school teachers and spent the majority of my 30's volunteering in my kids classrooms, and I can tell you firsthand that the bulk of parents/guardians don't have a clue what goes on from 8 am-3pm, and furthermore don't care. My sister had a Mother(and I use the term loosely) that her child was HER-my sister's--place to 'raise' her daughter during the school week! Can you believe that mentality? My sister has told me for years this is the kind of theory she's dealt with for years now, the bulk of parents expect teachers and administration to be responsible for their own children's upbringing. Maybe this is one factor behind the clandestine-like decision making? The really sad part in this example is my sister is a special education teacher, her pupils need even more parental involvement and the vast majority don't have it.

I'm on the downhill swing of my son's public education but believe you me I've been very vocal about things I was aware of going on in both my children's schools--too bad other parents won't take the time to do a little investigating, huh? Kudos to you for that!




posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 09.21.06 (10:16 am)

Reply to: surrogate

Goodness, Surr. That's crazy. It's much worse than I realized. I guess that means I'll just have to fight harder to raise a couple of kids the way I choose, as opposed to how corporations would dictate our lifestyles. I tell ya.. the corporate meltdown is coming. I don't want to sound like some kind of apocalyptic nutcase (who knows, maybe I am), but I really think some big things are going to happen, and while they may be tough and painful in the moment, I suspect the rebuilding will be the nest thing that ever happened to us. A technology meltdown would be my favorite. Some kind of weird explosion that wipes most of the networks off the face of the planet.. boy would *that* be fun! :)




posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 09.21.06 (10:21 am)

Reply to: FinalyFree

Now that's just down right sad, Shannon. It's sad all the way around.. for the kids, for the parents.. I wonder.. do most people have kids because they are expected to, or because they don't have any idea what they are getting into long term? I really have to wonder.. if procreating is such a tough shake, why are so many people having children? I swear, I thought it was supposed to be enjoyable.. but, what do I know.. *grumble grumble*

There's a pervasive seflishness sweeping through a large number of people in the US.. it's everywhere.. in their marriages, in their lifestyles, in their children's education, it just keeps going and going.. people don't seem to be finding very much contentment with the lifestyles they've built for themselves.. I guess no one has considered checking into that. The American dream, as it were, seems to be more of an illusion. Poop.

Let's hope your kids and mine don't turn out to be the next big serial killer to hit the states..




posted by: FinalyFree (reply)
post date: 09.21.06 (11:06 am)

Reply to: lindy
Honestly...I don't think most parents thing two-shits about the responsibilities of raising children. I know the majority of them don't think of it prior to conception and about as few after the fact. I'll be the first to admit that public education leaves a lot to be desired but I also have another perspective--that of an educator. There's no way on Earth I'd choose the profession--the money is laughable and the stresses are unbelievable.

I have to go back to a little Dr. Phil philosophy--I know you love that, heh--but he's right, until people stand up and are held accountable and "own" the repercussions of their actions there's no way to fix anything--from your marriage all the way down to your parenting skills. And from everything I've seen these days it's much easier to expect someone else to do your share of the work and when things don't work out--just blame someone else. Selfish. Yes!




posted by: FinalyFree (reply)
post date: 09.21.06 (11:07 am)

Reply to: FinalyFree
duhhh..."most parents THINK two-shits about the responsibilities of raising children." I always screw when I try to type curse words, LMAO.




posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 09.21.06 (3:02 pm)

Reply to: finalyfree

hahaha, I knew what you meant and glazed right over the typo - as I make plenty of 'em myself! As for the rest of what you said.. indeed, you are preaching to the choir, sister! The words 'appropriate' and 'personal accountability' have become a bit of a teaser in my house.. namely, the rest of the family teasing ME! :) By the way, I *have to* point out the irony of your last comment.. go back and read it again and see if anything jumps out at you.

*falls off chair laughing*



posted by: FinalyFree (reply)
post date: 09.21.06 (3:20 pm)

Reply to: lindy
Ya know, I really shouldn't be allowed to even have a freakin keyboard....LOL. Thank goodness you've known me long enough to know what I'm trying to say, heh.




posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 09.21.06 (7:42 pm)

Replyto: finalyfree

Yes, apparently, we know each other so well that you feel comfortable telling me that you screw when you try to type curse words.;)



posted by: basild (reply)
post date: 09.22.06 (11:40 am)

I finally pulled my 12 year old daughter out of the public school system and am home-schooling her. It's been great up to this point, and if your woes with your local school continue, it might be a viable option.



posted by: lindy (reply)
post date: 09.23.06 (6:30 am)

I sincerely wish that were an option, Basil. I'm a single mother, recently married. Not sure that would be the right kind of strain on the relationship. Of course, if things continue to get worse, I may move heaven and earth to make it happen. Thanks for planting the seed. It just might grow. I love the idea of home schooling. It seems to be gaining some popularity of late. That would be a good trend if it continued, I think.



posted by: commontater (reply)
post date: 09.26.06 (8:09 am)

Man, I get sick, web-free for a few days and come back to read these great comments by you, Lindy, followed up by your grrlfriends astute comments :) You gals are feisty, full of wit, spit and fire. I love it! It's so refreshing to read how much time and thought you give to doing the very best for your kids. It's comforting to me to know that there's always going to be people who are reflective, meditative, contemplative, wise, considerate and loving no matter what the state of affairs we find ourselves in, societal-wise, I mean. (Is that even a word? Lindy?) Obviously you all have assessed the situation, find it unacceptable, and are ready to kick some *ss. Way to go. Kudos!

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing."
-Edmund Burke (1729-1797)

PuC



posted by: Lindy (reply)
post date: 09.26.06 (8:32 am)

Reply to: commontater

Hee hee. Danke, PuC. Miss Shannon (FinalyFree, one L on purpose) is quite a spitfire, if I do say so myself. We get into the occasional bit of trouble, though she's far more a peace maker than I am. :)

You know.. when I read your posts and comments, PuC, I look for tell-tale signs that might lead me to conclude which of your several profile pictures reveals the true you. You seem to be a perfect blend of both (and more), defying even gender stereotypes. It's priceless. I hope you are feeling better. :)




posted by: Someone Who Knows (reply)
post date: 10.01.06 (7:05 am)

Borderline Personality Disorder... ever heard of it?

Your Name:


Your Comment: